Ballinacarriga Castle & the Hurleys

1. Introduction & Method: One Castle, Many Retellings

Part I — The Castle and the Question

Ballinacarriga Castle, the keep, from the 1906 Cork Journal
Ballinacarriga Castle: the keep, as illustrated in the Cork Journal, 1906.

Ballinacarriga is probably the best-known building connected with the Hurley name, and one of the most often described tower houses in West Cork. Yet nearly every modern description repeats the same few sentences without saying where they came from. This opening section explains why that matters, sets out the method used in the rest of this history, and traces how the familiar sources borrow from one another. The aim is to separate the few independent pieces of evidence from the many retellings.

The Problem: Ten Sources That Are Really Two

The standard account runs like this. Randal Hurley built the castle in 1585 and carved the date, with his initials and those of his wife Catherine, in a window of the upper chamber. His family held it until the rebellion of 1641, when it was forfeited and passed to the Crofts. It appears, in almost these words, on the Office of Public Works' heritage page, on Wikipedia, on local-history and tourism sites, in genealogy trees and in blog posts. Read side by side, they seem to confirm one another.

They mostly do not. Trace the sentences back and nearly all of them lead to one of three nineteenth- and early twentieth-century writers:

Later writers restated these, sometimes word for word. The schoolchildren who wrote about the castle for the Irish Folklore Commission's Schools' Collection in the late 1930s copied the 1906 article nearly verbatim. Ten web pages saying “built by Randal Hurley in 1585” therefore carry the weight of perhaps two sources, not ten. Some of them also carry errors that crept in along the way.

Underneath the retellings, a small body of independent evidence does survive. Some of it is contemporary with Randal Hurley himself, and some of it has never been part of the popular account. This history is built on that layer.

Three Layers of Evidence

Every claim in this history is assigned to one of three layers, marked by a tag where it matters:

Documented
Evidence made at or near the time of the events, or the building itself: the castle's fabric and carved date stone, a map, a pardon, a patent, an inquisition, a land survey. This evidence can be misread, but it was not shaped by later storytelling.
Interpretation
A historian's or archaeologist's reading of the documented layer: for example, that the tower is older than its 1585 date stone, or that the initials “R.M. C.C.” stand for Randal Muirhily and Catherine O'Cullane. These readings are often well founded, but they are arguments, and they can disagree.
Tradition
What families and neighbours said, however long they said it: the tally sticks, the seven sons at one birth, Crohoore a Gunna and his eight-foot gun. Tradition is valuable evidence of memory and belief, and it sometimes preserves a real event in distorted form. It is recorded faithfully here, but it is never treated as proof.

A claim does not move up a layer because it is repeated often or printed in a respected journal. It moves up only when someone points to the evidence behind it.

Where the Familiar Account Comes From

The table below lists every source examined so far, oldest first, with what each contributes and what it appears to rest on. Each will get its own section in Part II.

The sources and their dependencies (provisional; revised as each section is written)
SourceDateWhat it contributesWhat it rests onLayer
Contemporary records
Jobson's map of Munsterc. 1584“Benecarick Castle” shown on the mapSurveyor's own recordDoc.
Fiants of Elizabeth, nos. 4488 & 4493July 1584Pardon to “Randal oge Hurley of Ballinacarriga castle”Chancery warrant, known from the printed calendarsDoc.
The castle's date stone1585“1585” and “R.M. C.C.” carved in the upper chamberThe building itselfDoc.
Fair patent19 Dec 1615Fair granted to “Ranell Oge Hurley, gent.”Patent rolls of James I, as quoted in 1906Doc.
Inquisition at Bandon16 Sep 1631Randal's death; his son Randal Oge succeedsKnown through Bennett and the 1906 articleDoc.
Youghal sessions; Down Survey; Book of Distribution1642; 1650sOutlawry of Randal Hurly and his son; “Ard-Eah als. Ballincarrigg” held by Randall oge Hurley, granted to Richard DashwoodGovernment land records, printed in the 1906 articleDoc.
Antiquarian and local histories
Dublin Penny Journal1834Mass held in the castle hall until 1815; a colourful history that Roaringwater Journal calls “highly improbable”Not yet examinedTrad.?
Lewis, Topographical Dictionary1837Height (96 ft), carvings; founder “Randal McCarty and his wife Catherine Collins”; tower “probably of the 12th or 13th century”Unstated; probably local correspondentsInterp.
D'Alton, Illustrations… of King James's Irish Army List, “Lieutenant John Hurly”1855Outlawry of 1642 naming “Randle Hurley and Randle Hurley Oge of Ballynacarrig”; de Courcy (Kinsale) marriages; the Knocklong pedigreeOutlawry records; Lodge's Peerage; the “Hurly Manuscript Pedigree Book” (the Kerry family's own manuscript)Doc. / Interp.
Bennett, History of Bandon1862 / 1869“Built… in 1585”; death in 1631 from the inquisition; the tally-stick and seven-sons legendsThe inquisition, plus local oral tradition (“if what we have been told is correct”)Interp. / Trad.
Some Account of the Family of O'Hurly, JCHAS1905–06Family line; full description of the castle; Crohoore a Gunna; outlawry and grants; Gillman's ground planGillman's 1896 site visit and notes, family papers, Bennett, printed recordsAll three
Twentieth-century and modern
Healy's notebooks, “Castles in County Cork”c. 1937“Built by Randal Oge Hurley at a noted pass”; garrisoned in 1641Smith (1750) and LewisInterp.
Schools' Collection (Kilmeen; Macroom)1937–38Castle descriptionsCopied largely from the 1906 article—
Collins, two articles in JCHAS1951Cites the 1584 Fiants directly; records a tradition that Randal's mother was an O'CrowleyThe printed Fiants; oral tradition, which he flags as unreliableDoc. / Trad.
Samuel, Tower Houses of West Cork (PhD, UCL)1998Site-by-site survey; links the 1584 pardon to the tower's completionField survey, the 1905–06 article, Gillman, Ó Murchadha (1985), the Archaeological InventoryInterp.
OPW, Wikipedia, local-history & blog sites2000s–The standard short account; some raise the possibility of an earlier McCarthy towerMostly Lewis, Bennett and the 1906 article, restatedInterp.

Two things stand out. First, the contemporary records in the top group barely appear in the popular account. Most reach print only through the 1906 article or Collins's 1951 notes, and none of the modern web pages cites them. Second, several of the best-known “facts” come from a single antiquarian with no stated source. For example, the forfeiture to the Crofts sits awkwardly beside the Book of Distribution, which names Richard Dashwood as grantee of Ballinacarriga itself. That conflict is taken up in Section 19.

How Each Section Is Organized

The source sections in Part II follow the same pattern:

  1. The source: what it is, when and by whom it was made, and where it can be seen today.
  2. What it says about the castle and the Hurleys, quoted where possible, with page or folio references.
  3. Where it came from: the author's own sources, stated or inferred.
  4. What agrees and what conflicts with the other sources.
  5. Verdict: which layer its claims belong to, and how far they can be relied on.
  6. Historical context: what was happening in Carbery, Munster or Ireland at the time that helps explain the record.

Part III then takes the disputed questions one at a time: when and by whom the tower was built, Hurley or McCarthy, Randal's family, and the forfeiture. It sets the evidence from Part II side by side. Part IV gathers the legends, a single sourced timeline, and a guide for anyone citing Randal Oge Hurley on a family-tree profile.

Historical Note — Why So Little Survives

If the contemporary records are so valuable, why are there so few? Most of the government records of Tudor and Stuart Ireland were kept in the Public Record Office at the Four Courts in Dublin, which was destroyed by explosion and fire in June 1922, during the Civil War. What survives of the Fiants, patents and inquisitions often survives only because Victorian archivists had already calendared or abstracted them in print. The Fiants of Elizabeth, for instance, were published in the Deputy Keeper's reports in the 1870s–1880s. Local antiquaries such as Bennett and the 1906 Cork Journal author also copied records that no longer exist. That is one reason their work cannot simply be set aside: at times a retelling is the only surviving witness to a lost document. It is also why each citation here tries to name the record behind the retelling, not just the retelling itself.

Status: first draft. The dependency table is provisional and will be revised as each Part II section is written and each source is read in full. Sources not yet examined directly are marked as such. Corrections and additional sources are welcome.

← Series index Next: 2. The Castle as Evidence (in preparation)